In this study, researchers measured disgust using the Three Domain Disgust Scale, rating items from "not disgusting at all" to "extremely disgusting".An example of a sex-related item is "hearing two strangers having sex", and a conventionally non-sexual item — "stepping on dog poop." Different people have stronger or weaker gross-out reactions.At times reminiscent of a stroll through Amsterdam's Red Light District, not in terms of literal financial transactions, but in the sense of a candidly sexual department store window display — mass objectification.One gets the subtle hint that it is easy to find a lover, take-out or delivery.You can then make informed choices about how to position yourself (no pun intended) and what avenues to use to meet folks to best achieve your relationship goals. The players of micro-dating: individual and gender differences in goal orientations toward mirco-dating apps.
More recently, research has found that men are more likely to use Tinder for casual sex (Carpenter and Mc Ewan, 2016), and are less selective in their choices than are women (Tyson et al., 2016). More recently, researchers sought to clarify what ingredients go into hooking-up on Tinder (Sevi et al., 2017), pinging 163 Tinder users in the United States using an internet survey.Everyone knows that lots of people use apps like Tinder for meeting partners for casual sex, or "hooking up".Data from a recent survey (Carpenter and Mc Ewan, 2016) of college students shows that in this sample, the top three reasons for using dating apps were, in order: entertainment, dating and sex (a close third).Notably, for women, lower sexual disgust predicted higher sociosexuality, but only as a secondary effect - when they controlled for sociosexuality, difference in sexual disgust were not significant. In the case of sexual behavior, disgust may improve mate selection and reduce risk (e.g.sexually transmitted disease, unwanted pregnancy, bonding with unsuitable mates).Sociosexual orientation was estimated using the Revised Sociosexual Orientation Inventory, using subscales for Behavior, Attitude and Desire e.g."with how many different partners have you had sexual intercourse on one and only one occasion?Since disgust is great at putting the brakes on impulsivity, the absence of disgust as a main factor in this sample of women on Tinder suggests that there may be less hesitation to engage in a hook-up.Alcohol and other drugs, often a part of casual sex as well as traditional courtship in many cases, further reduce impulse control and play a role in hook-ups.Evidence-based dating sounds funny to the ear, but more and more research is coming to inform the way dating apps work, and this is the advent of big data.Real-time dating apps like Tinder intensify the interpersonal dating situation by rewarding impulsive behaviors, given the expectation of immediate gratification (delivering casual sex quickly and geographically conveniently) essentially rewarding impulsivity, which can be functional and dysfunctional.The study authors hypothesize that women who use Tinder may have lower sexual disgust sensitivity in the first place, leading to a biased sample.In other words, the authors wonder if women on Tinder are on average less disgusted by sex than women in general, suggesting that Tinder users may be a self-selected sample of women who are less disgusted by sex, and consequently more sex positive — and in turn, more likely to engage in casual sex.Survey respondents were 56% women, average age 27.9 years old, and 88% heterosexual.